The first study examined all previous research that compared patients
who did or did not receive contrast agents, while the second paper
represented a new retrospective study of over 100,000 CT scans performed
at Mayo Clinic from 2000 to 2010, the largest published study to date
examining the effect of contrast-enhanced imaging on renal function. In
the retrospective study, researchers performed statistical analyses to
study causality and mimic a randomized controlled trial to better match
patients who received contrast agents to those patients who did not.
These techniques had not been performed in any prior studies of renal
function following contrast administration.
"These studies have significant clinical ramifications with regard to who is eligible to receive contrast media during CT exams," says lead co-author Bob McDonald, M.D., Ph.D., a radiologist at Mayo Clinic. "Despite limited clinical evidence, contrast is commonly withheld during CT exams of individuals with even modest renal impairment due to concern for kidney injury, often at the expense of diagnostic accuracy of the exam. Our goal for these studies was to provide better evidence regarding the true incidence of renal injury following intravenous contrast administration and better define the 'at-risk' patient population."
In both studies, Mayo Clinic researchers found that patients who
received intravenous contrast agents and those who didn't had a similar
risk of developing acute kidney injury.
"Our findings suggest that, if contrast-induced nephropathy exists at
all, it is likely rare and cannot be easily identified from unrelated
causes of renal injury," says lead co-author Jennifer McDonald, Ph.D., a
radiology associate at Mayo Clinic. "Hopefully our findings can promote
additional research to help redefine the safety window of contrast
media and, in turn, improve patient care through more frequent use of
appropriate clinical imaging."
Source: Mayo Clinic
