Study: Do EHRs Affect Workflow in the ER?
"Our study highlights the broader problem that commercial systems are often not adequately designed, from a usability perspective, to support the workflow processes of the clinician," senior study author Raj Ratwani, PhD, told ICU Management. "Our results may be one explanation for the dissatisfaction clinicians have with EHRs and for the increased frustration."
Dr. Ratwani, Scientific Director of the National Center for Human Factors in Healthcare at MedStar Health in Washington, D.C., and colleagues studied workflow for three periods: pre-implementation of the EHR, one week following widespread use of the EHR ("go-live") and 3 to 4 months after the EHR was implemented. Time spent on computer-based tasks increased from 31 minutes pre-implementation to 44 minutes in the go-live period. In addition, verbal communication decreased from 19 minutes pre-implementation to 11 minutes in the go-live period.
Although time spent on computer-based tasks eventually returned to pre-implementation levels, the increase in tasks performed per minute continued during long-term use of the commercial EHR. The number of tasks emergency physicians engaged in per minute increased from 1.7 tasks during the pre-implementation period to 1.9 tasks during post-implementation and stayed there.
"Our study underscores the need for a user-centred design approach that puts the needs of clinicians at the forefront of EHR design and development. This means engaging clinicians early and often during design, more rigorous user testing by the vendors prior to releasing these systems, as well as improved research by the healthcare system (in conjunction with the vendor) in discovering the best way to incorporate these systems into their current work practices," Dr. Ratwani pointed out.
He revealed that his team is currently conducting extensive research to improve the usability of health IT systems from a policy perspective as well as from the frontline clinician perspective. At the policy level, he said his group only recently had testified at the Senate HELP committee on EHR usability and published a paper in JAMA describing how many EHR vendors do not adhere to usability standards.
From a research perspective, he added, "we have a R01 grant from the Agency for Health Research in Quality entitled 'Cognitive Engineering for Complex Decision Making & Problem Solving in Acute Care'; we are focusing on work processes in the ED." The goal of this initiative is to iteratively design an ED information system that supports the unique decision-making needs of ED personnel, he explained. "Our aim is that findings and methods used in this study will inform future EHR design."
Claire Pillar, Managing Editor, ICU Management & HealthManagement.org
Source: American College of Emergency Physicians; Interview
Image credit: MedStar Institute for Innovation
Published on : Mon, 28 Sep 2015
Print as PDF
The fully featured ICU ventilator, HAMILTON-MR1, guarantees uncompromised continuous ventilation care from the ICU to the MRI scanner and back. Its reliability and high performance, with advanced lung-protective strategies and patient-adaptive modes,...
The HAMILTON-C3 ventilator is a modular high-end ventilation solution for all patient groups. Offering a number of unique features, the HAMILTON-C3 is one of the first ventilators featuring the “Ventilation Autopilot” INTELLiVENT-ASV®. The HAMILTON-C3’s...
Medos hemofilters pro are used for efficient and gentle hemofiltration during extracorporal circulation.Medos hemofilters pro do not need to be pre-flushed and can be used immediately. This guarantees a safe and quick hemofiltration.
NovaPort cannulas: The safe access to the vascular system. NovaPort® twin double lumen cannulas are specifically developed for veno-venous vascular access. NovaPort one single lumen cannulas are specifically developed for the percutaneous connection (KU)...