Study: Do Checklists Improve Care in the ICU?
The study was conducted by Conroy, Research Project Officer at the New South Wales (NSW) Intensive Care Coordination and Monitoring Unit, Agency for Clinical Innovation, Australia, with colleagues from the Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney. The focus was on compliance with care processes and concordance between respondents to the checklist implemented in an ICU within a tertiary hospital. The e-checklist was used during morning ward rounds to document either the delivery or clinical reasons for non-delivery of cares.
A retrospective audit of a random selection of patient medical records was undertaken to compare with checklist data completed during the same time frame. Documentation in the patients' medical records was used as a proxy measure for actual completion of care. A specific audit tool extracted information from both the checklist and the medical record on the following processes of care: nutrition, pain, weaning from ventilation, glucose control, head-of-bed elevation, sedation management, deep vein thrombosis, stress ulcer prophylaxis, and medication review. To test validity of the e-checklist, established measures of concordance (agreement between two observation sets) were used to compare physician and audit responses.
Results showed that compliance with each care component improved significantly over time: the largest improvement was for pain management (42% increase; adjusted odds ratio = 23, p < 0.001); followed by glucose management (22% increase, p < 0.001) and head-of-bed elevation (19% increase, p < 0.001), both with odds ratios greater than 10.
In addition, most detected omissions were corrected by the following day. Control charts illustrated reduced variability in care compliance over time. There was good concordance between physician and auditor e-checklist responses — seven out of nine cares had kappa values above 0.8.
Conroy noted in an email that a clinical information system for intensive care units — electronic Record for Intensive Care (eRIC) — is currently being developed and a process-of-care checklist will be integrated. "Given the plan is to implement eRIC widely across the state, this is our current strategy for broader checklist implementation."
She thinks further research is needed to evaluate delivery of routine care before and after implementation of the clinical information system. "This is complex and requires more thought and planning as there is a lot more to the clinical information system(s) than just the checklist that could impact on changes in care delivery," she said. We are therefore in the early stages of planning future directions."
Claire Pillar, Managing Editor, HealthManagement.org
Source: Annals of Intensive Care; Interview
Image credit: Flickr.com
Published on : Tue, 29 Sep 2015
*Not yet available in all markets The Most Comprehensive Critical Care Analyzer One analyzer, up to 20 tests No other blood gas analyzer can match the clinical value of pHOx Ultra, which provides up to 20 critical care tests from one...
Intended for staged extubation and subsequent reintubation. Features and benefits The soft, blunt tip is designed to be atraumatic to internal structures. The distal sideports ensure sufficient airflow and prevent whipping during use...
Not yet available in the U.S. The most extensively studied and proven glucose measurement technology In addition to studies submitted to the FDA, 168 other independent studies over the last eight years—including 53 critical care studies—have...
The power of B•R•A•H•M•S with the difference that only VITROS ® can deliver B•R•A•H•M•S PCT is the best biomarker for early bacterial Sepsis Sepsis is a life threatening condition where the body overreacts to an infection. I
ExThera’s proprietary Seraph 100 Microbind Affinity Blood Filter (Seraph 100) is a first-of-its kind, CE Marked, technology designed to reduce bloodborne pathogens during bloodstream infections. Validated in preclinical studies and in a clinical trial...