Study: Do Checklists Improve Care in the ICU?
The study was conducted by Conroy, Research Project Officer at the New South Wales (NSW) Intensive Care Coordination and Monitoring Unit, Agency for Clinical Innovation, Australia, with colleagues from the Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney. The focus was on compliance with care processes and concordance between respondents to the checklist implemented in an ICU within a tertiary hospital. The e-checklist was used during morning ward rounds to document either the delivery or clinical reasons for non-delivery of cares.
A retrospective audit of a random selection of patient medical records was undertaken to compare with checklist data completed during the same time frame. Documentation in the patients' medical records was used as a proxy measure for actual completion of care. A specific audit tool extracted information from both the checklist and the medical record on the following processes of care: nutrition, pain, weaning from ventilation, glucose control, head-of-bed elevation, sedation management, deep vein thrombosis, stress ulcer prophylaxis, and medication review. To test validity of the e-checklist, established measures of concordance (agreement between two observation sets) were used to compare physician and audit responses.
Results showed that compliance with each care component improved significantly over time: the largest improvement was for pain management (42% increase; adjusted odds ratio = 23, p < 0.001); followed by glucose management (22% increase, p < 0.001) and head-of-bed elevation (19% increase, p < 0.001), both with odds ratios greater than 10.
In addition, most detected omissions were corrected by the following day. Control charts illustrated reduced variability in care compliance over time. There was good concordance between physician and auditor e-checklist responses — seven out of nine cares had kappa values above 0.8.
Conroy noted in an email that a clinical information system for intensive care units — electronic Record for Intensive Care (eRIC) — is currently being developed and a process-of-care checklist will be integrated. "Given the plan is to implement eRIC widely across the state, this is our current strategy for broader checklist implementation."
She thinks further research is needed to evaluate delivery of routine care before and after implementation of the clinical information system. "This is complex and requires more thought and planning as there is a lot more to the clinical information system(s) than just the checklist that could impact on changes in care delivery," she said. We are therefore in the early stages of planning future directions."
Claire Pillar, Managing Editor, HealthManagement.org
Source: Annals of Intensive Care; Interview
Image credit: Flickr.com
Published on : Tue, 29 Sep 2015
The system is easy to use and delivers incredibly fast, accurate, and standardized results with minimal centrifugation time of five minutes. Beyond Results. Confidence. Leverage the comprehensive power of Ortho’s trusted testing menu....
*Not yet available in all markets The Most Comprehensive Critical Care Analyzer One analyzer, up to 20 tests No other blood gas analyzer can match the clinical value of pHOx Ultra, which provides up to 20 critical care tests from one...
Taking Lab Productivity to the Next Level Ortho’s full portfolio provides a scalable solution that drives integration across your lab and network. One Connection, Complete Control Ortho’s enhanced middleware solution that allows you...
The VITROS ® XT 7600 removes the obstacles to reducing turnaround time and increasing your ability to provide meaningful results. The Result of Quality VITROS ® XT Systems embrace DIGITAL CHEMISTRY ™ and are powered by a new digital...
Equip Your Lab With More Than 120 Assays in One Integrated System Quality, reliability and value for your lab – making the best labs better. VITROS ® Is Versatile Your lab is under constant pressure to do more. The VITROS ® 5600 features...