ICU Management & Practice, Volume 18 - Issue 2, 2018

Addressing the gender gap in critical care

Addressing the gender gap in critical care
share Share

A “persistent and pervasive” gender gap in academic critical care medicine is highlighted in a recent article in Critical Care Medicine by Geeta Mehta, MD, of the Department of Medicine and Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, Sinai Health System, University of Toronto, Canada and colleagues from Canada and the UK (Mehta et al. 2018). The paper is the latest in a number of reports that highlight the disparity between the proportion of female intensivists in the healthcare workforce and their representation in conference faculty, editorial boards and critical care society leadership (Modra et al. 2016; Mehta et al. 2017).


Dr. Mehta and colleagues analysed women’s participation as faculty in three international and two national critical care conferences held between 2010 and 2016. They found that in all the meetings reviewed male speakers outnumbered female speakers, with the gap more marked among physician speakers than speakers from nursing and allied health professions. The Society of Critical Care Medicine conference had the highest representation of women, and together with the UK Intensive Care Society State of the Art meeting showed a significant increase in proportion of female speakers over time.


You might also like: Women in Leadership in Intensive Care Medicine


The authors note: “We do not propose gender parity over excellence, nor do we propose arbitrary percentages of women…our proposals are based on representation of the gender demographic of our specialty and the provision of equal opportunities for equally meritorious women and men. We advocate for the invitation of women who are as qualified and accomplished as their male peers and who would enrich a program.”


They propose four organisational strategies to increase women’s participation as speakers at critical care conferences, including policies that have gender equity objectives based on merit, 30-40% females on programme committees, publication of metrics and an international speaker’s directory. Dr. Mehta told ICU Management & Practice that the Critical Care Canada Forum is working to improve its gender balance at its next meeting.


«« Standardised communication and procedures to improve patient transfer from ICU to ward

Procalcitonin does not curb antibiotic use for lower respiratory tract infection »»


Mehta S, Burns KEA, Machado FR et al. (2017) Gender Parity in Critical Care Medicine. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 196(4): 425-9.


Mehta S, Rose L, Cook D et al. (2018) The speaker gender gap at critical care conferences. Crit Care Med, 28 Mar. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003114. [Epub ahead of print]


Modra L, Yong S, Austin D (2016) Women in leadership in intensive care medicine. ICU Management & Practice, 16(3): 174-6. Available from:


Related Articles

Is the gender gap a concern for intensive care medicine (ICM)? ICM is not gender friendly by design and this could have a... Read more

An overview of the impact of gender on the severity of illness, impact and outcomes of COVID-19. T he human coronaviruses... Read more

Related IssueArticles

The idea of liver assist is extremely attractive for patients with liver failure, as the liver possesses huge capacity to regenerate.... Read more

Coagulation management remains a formidable challenge in severely bleeding trauma patients. A strong rationale suggests starting... Read more

What happens before patients arrive in the ICU? We know that status pre-ICU is associated with outcomes after patients leave... Read more

gender gap in critical care, healthcare workforce, female intensivists, critical care leadership A “persistent and pervasive” gender gap in academic critical care medicine is highlighted in a recent article in Critical Care Medicine by Geeta Mehta and colleagues.

No comment

Please login to leave a comment...

Highlighted Products