Breast cancer screening: performance of supplemental ultrasonography

share Share
New research shows that for women at low, intermediate, and high breast cancer risk, there were significantly higher short-interval follow-up and biopsy recommendation rates with screening mammography plus same-day ultrasonography compared with mammography alone. However, no significant increase in cancer detection or decrease in interval cancer rates was observed. These results suggest that the benefits of supplemental ultrasonography screening may not outweigh associated harms, according to the study published in JAMA Internal Medicine. 

Whole-breast ultrasonography has been advocated to supplement screening mammography to improve outcomes in women with dense breasts. As the number of states with breast density notification laws continues to increase, postlegislation reports indicate small but significantly increased use of supplemental ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), among women with mammographically dense breasts, with a greater observed increase in ultrasonography use compared with MRI. 


However, accurate information on the effectiveness of screening ultrasonography is needed to provide guidance on whether widespread use of screening breast ultrasonography with screening mammography would be a beneficial strategy. 

For this JAMA study, researchers conducted a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data – 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2013 – in two Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium (BCSC) registries. The aim was to assess use of screening ultrasonography in community practice and to investigate the performance of screening mammography plus ultrasonography compared with screening mammography alone in women across the spectrum of breast cancer risk. 

A total of 6,081 screening mammography plus same-day screening ultrasonography examinations in 3,386 women were propensity score matched 1:5 to 30,062 screening mammograms without screening ultrasonography in 15,176 women from a sample of 113,293 mammograms. Exclusion criteria included a personal history of breast cancer and self-reported breast symptoms. 

The researchers reported these key findings: 

- Screening mammography with vs. without ultrasonography examinations was performed more often in women with dense breasts (74.3% [n = 4,317 of 5,810] vs. 35.9% [n = 39 ,928 of 111, 306] in the overall sample), in women who were younger than 50 years (49.7% [n = 3,022 of 6,081] vs. 31.7% [n = 16, 897 of 112, 462]), and in women with a family history of breast cancer (42.9% [n = 2,595 of 6,055] vs. 15.0% [n = 16 ,897 of 112, 462]).

 - While 21.4% (n = 1,154 of 5,392) of screening ultrasonography examinations were performed in women with high or very high (≥2.50%) BCSC 5-year risk scores, 53.6% (n = 2,889 of 5,392) had low or average (<1.67%) risk. 

- Comparing mammography plus ultrasonography with mammography alone, the cancer detection rate was similar at 5.4 vs. 5.5 per 1,000 screens (adjusted relative risk [RR], 1.14; 95% CI, 0.76-1.68), as were interval cancer rates at 1.5 vs. 1.9 per 1000 screens (RR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.33-1.37). 

The research team also found that the false-positive biopsy rates were significantly higher at 52.0 vs. 22.2 per 1,000 screens, as was short-interval follow-up at 3.9% vs. 1.1%. The positive predictive value (PPV) of biopsy recommendation was significantly lower at 9.5% vs. 21.4%. 

These results of increased biopsy recommendation rates and false-positive biopsy recommendation rates and decreased specificity and PPV of supplemental screening ultrasonography are consistent with findings from multiple studies conducted in the United States, Europe, and Asia, according to the research team led by Janie M. Lee, MD, MSc, Department of Radiology, University of Washington in Seattle. 

Additionally, the results reflect real-world clinical practice in the U.S. for women across the spectrum of breast cancer risk who received same-day, supplemental ultrasonography screening, adding information about the incremental performance and outcomes of supplemental screening with ultrasonography compared with mammography alone. As shown in this study, supplemental ultrasonography screening was used not only in women with dense breasts: 25.7% of women receiving it had nondense breasts. 

Source: JAMA Internal Medicine 
Image credit: iStock

«« Radiologists benefit by direct communication with patients


Dealing with 'different personalities' in the radiology department »»

References:

Lee JM et al. (2019) Performance of Screening Ultrasonography as an Adjunct to Screening Mammography in Women Across the Spectrum of Breast Cancer Risk. JAMA Intern Med. Published online 18 March 2019. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.8372

Published on : Tue, 19 Mar 2019



Related Articles

Radiologists have long been considered “ doctors’ doctors ,” as they communicate primarily with referring physicians and other... Read more

Researchers in the U.S. performed an objective and subjective evaluation of a large, academic radiology department's transition... Read more

 #SIR19ATX:  Professor and chair of the department of radiology and medical imaging at the University of Virginia, discusses... Read more

MRI, Mammography, Radiology, mammogram, breast screening, dense breast, Point-of care ultrasonography, Whole-breast ultrasonography, woman's health New research shows that for women at low, intermediate, and high breast cancer risk, there were significantly higher short-interval follow-up and biopsy recommendation rates with screening mammography plus same-day ultrasonography compared with mammograph

One comment


michell kell

michell kell

(2020-09-29 14:10)
I just got my ex husband back through the help of Dr Nkosi love spells Experts. My husband left me for another woman, This was just 3 years of our marriage. The most painful thing is that I was pregnant with our second baby. I wanted him back. I did everything within my reach to bring him back but all was in vain, I wanted him back so badly because of the love I had for him, I begged him with everything, I made promises but he refused. I explained my problem to my friend and she suggested that I should rather contact a spell caster that could help me cast a spell to bring him back , I had no choice than to try it. I messaged the spell caster called dr nkosi, and he assured me there was no problem and that everything will be okay before 11 hours. He cast the spell and surprisingly 11 hours later my husband called me. I was so surprised, I answered the call and all he said was that he was so sorry for everything that had happened He wanted me to return to him. He also said he loved me so much. I was so happy and went to him that was how we started living together happily again.thanks to dr nkosi. if you are here and your Lover is turning you down, or your husband moved to another woman, do not cry anymore, contact Dr.Nkosi for help now..Here his contact, WhatsApp him: +27820502562 {or} Email him at: [email protected] ,his website: www.fastsolutiontemple.com

Please login to leave a comment...

Highlighted Products