ICU Management & Practice, Volume 16 - Issue 3, 2016

Evolving Concepts in Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure

share Share

Most patients with liver cirrhosis ‏remain in a compensated stage for ‏more than 10 years, regardless of ‏the aetiology of the liver disease. The progression ‏to decompensated cirrhosis is defined by ‏the occurrence of a major complication such ‏as ascites, variceal bleeding and/or hepatic ‏encephalopathy. From here on most patients ‏will not die because of a progressive, irreversible ‏decrease in liver function, but because ‏of a relatively sudden event that precipitates ‏an acute deterioration in their clinical condition, ‏a syndrome termed acute-on-chronic ‏liver failure (ACLF). For many intensive care ‏specialists, ACLF stands for a critically ill patient ‏who is suffering from an intra- or extrahepatic ‏acute insult with serious repercussions ‏on both an existing chronic liver disease and ‏on other organ functions. It also means that, ‏as compared to the average intensive care unit ‏(ICU) patient, the patient has an unusually high ‏risk of death.

 

Concepts about cirrhosis have evolved ‏significantly in recent years, and major ‏advances have been made in defining the ‏natural history of ACLF (for general reviews ‏see Arroyo et al. 2016; Bernal et al. 2015; Sarin ‏and Choudhury 2016). The syndrome is highly ‏challenging for intensivists and poses difficult ‏questions related to the recognition of precipitating ‏factors, pathogenesis of extrahepatic ‏organ failures, accurate prognosis, medical ‏management, evaluation for urgent liver ‏transplantation and finally the identification ‏of those situations that may render intensive ‏care futile. The present appraisal will focus on ‏recent insights and their potential repercussions ‏on the way intensivists should understand and ‏manage patients with ACLF.

Definition and Natural History of Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure

 

There is no uncontested universal definition for ‏ACLF and the two most widely used definitions ‏depend on the origin of the hepatologists— ‏West versus East (Arroyo et al 2015; Sarin et al. ‏2014). For the purpose of this text we will use ‏the definition of the European Association for ‏the Study of the Liver – Chronic Liver Failure ‏(EASL-CLIF) Consortium, because extrahepatic ‏organ failure(s) and short-term mortality are ‏central to the definition and therefore more ‏closely mimic circumstances in the ICU. This ‏definition is based on a prospective, multicentre, ‏observational study (CANONIC study) ‏of 1343 patients who were hospitalised for ‏acute decompensation of cirrhosis (Moreau ‏et al 2013). ACLF is thus defined as a specific ‏syndrome comprising acute decompensation ‏of cirrhosis (development of ascites, variceal ‏bleeding, hepatic encephalopathy and/or ‏bacterial infections), organ failure and high ‏short-term mortality (by definition 28-day ‏mortality rate ≥15%) (Arroyo et al 2015). ‏ ‏


Based on the chronic liver failure (CLIF) Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure in Cirrhosis ‏(CANONIC) study a new grading system for ‏severity of ACLF (grade 0 to 4) has been introduced ‏built on a modified Sequential Organ ‏Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (Tables 1 and ‏2). This new grading system is proving useful ‏to diagnose the condition, to study the natural ‏history of ACLF, to stratify patients in interventional ‏trials and for prognostication (Gustot ‏et al 2015; Silva et al. 2015; Shi et al. 2016).

 



In the CANONIC study the prevalence of ‏ACLF in patients presenting to the hospital with ‏acute decompensation of cirrhosis was 31%. ‏Twenty-three percent had ACLF at the time of ‏admission and another 11% developed ACLF ‏during hospitalisation. Twenty-four percent ‏of the patients required care in the ICU with ‏one in three not fulfilling criteria for ACLF at ‏the time of admission to the ICU. A similar ‏prevalence ranging from 24 to 34% has been ‏reported in other large studies from China, ‏North America and Scandinavia (Li et al 2016; ‏Bajaj et al. 2014a; Sargenti et al. 2015). Almost ‏half of the patients with ACLF did not have ‏a prior history of acute decompensation, or ‏had developed the first decompensating event ‏within the three months prior to the diagnosis ‏of ACLF. This observation is relevant to ‏the extent that ACLF is not necessarily the final ‏event in a progressive course of decompensating ‏liver disease, but may occur at any point ‏in time after diagnosis of cirrhotic liver disease.

 

The clinical course of the condition is very ‏dynamic. One study observed resolution of ‏ACLF in 42.5% of patients across all grades of ‏ACLF, 53.5% in ACLF-1, 34.6% in ACLF-2 and ‏16% in ACLF-3 (Table 1) (Gustot et al. 2015). ‏In the CANONIC study the overall 28-day and ‏90-day mortality rates for patients with ACLF, ‏who did not undergo liver transplantation, ‏were 32.8% and 51.2%. Similar rates have been reported in other studies (Li et al. 2016). ‏These mortality rates are clearly different from ‏those in patients with acute decompensation ‏of liver cirrhosis but not fulfilling criteria for ‏ACLF (1.9% and 9.3%, respectively). The most ‏frequent cause of death in patients with ACLF ‏was multiple organ failure without septic or ‏hypovolaemic shock (40%), followed by septic ‏shock in approximately 25% of cases. The aetiology ‏of cirrhosis does not seem to be determinant ‏of outcome, but patients with gastrointestinal ‏haemorrhage as a precipitating factor do ‏better than patients who were not bleeding at ‏admission (McPhail et al. 2014).

 

It is often assumed that acute decompensation ‏of liver function is triggered by a clinically ‏identifiable, precipitating event. The trigger may ‏have a hepatic origin, such as drug-induced liver ‏injury, viral or ischaemic hepatitis, liver surgery ‏or undue alcohol consumption. It can also have ‏an extrahepatic origin such as acute bacterial ‏infection, major surgery or paracentesis. Interestingly, ‏in the CANONIC study, in 43.6% of the ‏patients with ACLF, no precipitating event could ‏be identified (Moreau et al. 2013). This observation ‏underscores the fact that in the majority ‏of patients we are not yet able to diagnose ‏the pathogenetic mechanism leading to acute ‏decompensation. Acute bacterial infection was ‏the most frequent precipitating event in 33% of ‏the patients (Moreau et al. 2013). ‏

 

See Also: Liver Intensive Care

Prevalence and Pathogenesis of Organ Dysfunctions Associated With ACLF

 

Organ dysfunction or failure is highly prevalent ‏in ACLF. Hepatic, renal, cerebral, coagulation ‏and circulatory dysfunctions are well known, ‏but important derangements in the function ‏of the heart, immune system, adrenal glands ‏and muscle have been also well documented. ‏In ACLF patients in the CANONIC study kidney ‏failure (56%) was the most frequent organ ‏failure followed by liver failure (44%), coagulation ‏(28%), cerebral (24%), circulation ‏(17%) and lung failure with 9%. The number ‏of failing organs correlates with increasing ‏white cell count and C-reactive protein (CRP) ‏levels (Jalan and Williams 2002).

 

Two pathogenetic mechanisms seem to be ‏important drivers of both intra- and extrahepatic ‏organ dysfunction: systemic inflammation ‏and dysbiosis of the microbiome (Bernardi ‏M. et al. 2015). Systemic inflammation may ‏be induced by bacterial pathogen-associated ‏molecular patterns (PAMPs) or by virulence ‏factors produced by bacteria. Patients with ‏cirrhosis have increased permeability of the ‏gut related to portal hypertension, inflammation- ‏mediated damage to the gut barrier and ‏altered gut flora. The result is increased translocation ‏of particularly Gram-negative bacteria, ‏PAMPs or virulence factors from the intestinal ‏lumen to the systemic circulation. The prevalence ‏of translocation of enteric organisms to ‏mesenteric lymph nodes in cirrhotic patients is ‏significantly increased according to the Child- ‏Pugh classification: 3.4% in Child A, 8.1% in ‏Child B and 30.8% in Child C patients (Cirera ‏et al. 2001). Systemic inflammation may also ‏be induced by ongoing necrosis of hepatocytes ‏or damage to the extracellular matrix caused ‏by alcohol, viral disease or any other aetiopathogenetic ‏mechanisms of cirrhosis. In this ‏case the molecules inducing inflammation are ‏called damage-associated molecular patterns ‏(DAMPs). How inflammation contributes to ‏organ dysfunction in ACLF has not yet been ‏fully elucidated. Besides the well-described ‏severe immune dysfunction associated with ‏cirrhosis with increased susceptibility to infection, ‏the following concepts are likely to be ‏important (Verbeke et al. 2011):

  1. The effects caused by immunopathology, a ‏term that describes the potential negative ‏impact of an excessive immune response ‏(Iwasaki and Medzhitov 2015). Either ‏PAMPs or DAMPs can cause immunopathology ‏that in turn may cause organ ‏dysfunction. In this case defence mechanisms ‏directed at controlling infection or ‏immunopathology are insufficient. This is ‏the likely mechanism in ACLF precipitated ‏by acute bacterial infection or severe alcoholic ‏hepatitis.
  2. Failed tolerance, a concept that describes ‏the incapacity to develop tolerance mechanisms ‏to persistent infection–mediated ‏inflammation (Medzhitov et al 2012). In ‏this case persistent ‘low-grade’ systemic ‏exposure to PAMPs or DAMPs may be the ‏reason for ongoing ‘sterile’ inflammation ‏for which no tolerance can be developed. ‏This concept provides an array of potential ‏new therapeutic targets aimed at increasing ‏tolerance.

 

Recent evidence points to gut dysbiosis as a ‏second important pathogenetic driver of organ ‏dysfunction in ACLF (Bajaj et al. 2014b; Chen ‏et al. 2015; Rai et al. 2014). Several factors ‏contribute to altered microbiota in cirrhosis, ‏including increased intestinal permeability, ‏abnormal small intestinal motility, impaired ‏antimicrobial defence, small intestinal bacterial ‏overgrowth, decreased bile acid production and ‏compromised enterohepatic circulation (Rai ‏et al. 2014). In stable cirrhosis there is a clear ‏change in diversity and composition of gut ‏microbiota with progressive dysbiosis in the ‏setting of decompensation. Similar changes have been reported in ACLF. In a recent trial ‏a relative abundance of Pasteurellacae was an ‏independent predictor for mortality and, ‏interestingly, the use of antibiotics had only ‏moderate impact on the gut flora (Chen et al. ‏2015). Robust correlations were also observed ‏between specific bacterial families and inflammatory ‏cytokines such as interleukin-6 and ‏TNF-alpha. A clear mechanistic link between ‏pathogenic colonic mucosal microbiota and ‏poor cognition has been demonstrated for ‏hepatic encephalopathy (Rai et al. 2014; Bajaj ‏et al. 2012). Remarkably, treatment with lactulose ‏in patients with hepatic encephalopathy ‏did not change faecal flora composition. It ‏remains unclear how gut dysbiosis contributes ‏to organ dysfunction. Current findings ‏suggest that relative gut overgrowth of one type ‏of bacteria or metabolites of certain bacteria ‏species can contribute to inflammation and ‏thereby to organ dysfunction.

 
Potential New Therapeutic Approaches

 

In specific situations early treatment of precipitating ‏events such as alcoholic hepatitis with ‏steroids or reactivation of hepatitis B with ‏antivirals can reduce mortality. However, ‏and for the most part, medical management ‏of organ failure in ACLF remains supportive. ‏Randomised trials with extracorporeal liver ‏support systems aimed at blood purification ‏did not result in survival benefits (Banares et ‏al. 2013; Kribben et al. 2012).

 

A recent observational study reported ‏improved clinical outcome with plasma ‏exchange in hepatitis B-related ACLF (Chen ‏2016). High hopes are placed in regenerative ‏therapy of cirrhosis including the use of growth ‏factors, the combination of G-CSF and erythropoietin, ‏hepatocyte and stem cell transplantation ‏(King et al. 2015; Kedarisetty et al. 2015, ‏Shiota and Itaba 2016; Duan et al. 2013; Garg ‏et al. 2012; Zekri et al. 2015). Granulocytecolony ‏stimulating factor (G-CSF) therapy in ‏ACLF reduced organ dysfunction and improved ‏survival (Chavez-Tapia et al. 2015). It is unclear ‏if the positive results obtained in randomised ‏trials with administration of G-SCF in ACLF ‏patients will be applicable in more severe forms ‏of ACLF in the ICU (Duan et al. 2013; Garg et ‏al. 2012).

 

Prognosis, Futility and Eligibility for Liver Transplantation

 

Many intensivists take a reserved attitude ‏towards the admission of ACLF patients because ‏of the dim prognosis of the syndrome. However, ‏several new facts have emerged in recent years ‏that defend a change in attitude and justify a ‏full evaluation for transplant for every patient ‏with ACLF admitted to the ICU. First, new data ‏show that liver fibrosis and even cirrhosis are ‏potentially reversible if the underlying cause is ‏removed, with significant improvement in longterm ‏survival (Ramachandran 2015). Second, ‏the outcome of ACLF in the ICU has improved ‏considerably. In expert ICUs survival of patients ‏with cirrhosis and organ failure improved from ‏40% in the year 2000 to 63% in the year 2010 ‏(McPhail et al. 2014). Similarly, ICU mortality ‏of cirrhotic patients with septic shock has ‏decreased from 74% in 1998 to 65.5% in ‏2010 (Galbois et al. 2014). Third, the course ‏of the disease is very dynamic with resolution ‏or improvement of ACLF in 4.2% of patients. ‏Eighty-one precent reach their final ACLF grade ‏at one week after admission, and it is now clear ‏that for most patients prognostication will be ‏considerably more accurate if done towards the ‏end of the first week of ICU stay (Gustot et al. ‏2015). Fourth, prognostication for these patients ‏has improved. New scoring systems, such as ‏the Chronic Liver Failure Consortium Acuteon- ‏Chronic Liver Failure score (CLIF-C ACLF) ‏score that incorporates a modified SOFA-score ‏(CLIF-Organ Failure [OF] score), age and white ‏blood cell count can be calculated on a daily ‏base in order to monitor evolution/resolution ‏of ACLF and provide a significantly better estimate ‏of risk for mortality than the model for ‏end-stage liver disease (MELD) or Child-Pugh ‏score (Jalan et al. 2014).

 

Considering the above, indiscriminate refusal of ICU admission ‏of ACLF patients is not acceptable any more, since no specific ‏group of patients can be identified at the time of diagnosis for ‏which medical ICU treatment may be considered futile. However, ‏intensivists also need to acknowledge that patients with four or ‏more organ failures or a CLIF-C ACLF score > 64 after one week of ‏ICU care have 28-day mortality rates in the range of 90 to 100%. ‏If ineligible for transplantation withdrawal of care is a reasonable ‏option for these patients.

 

Liver transplantation in ACLF is controversial and fraught with ‏uncertainties regarding case selection and timing (Pamecha et al. ‏2015; Reddy et al. 2015). Only 15-25 % of patients are actually ‏transplanted (Gustot et al. 2015, Finkenstedt et al. 2013). Recent ‏series have reported encouraging results with 1- and 5-year survival ‏of 80-90% (Finkenstedt et al. 2013; Chan et al. 2009). Even patients ‏with ACLF-3 may expect a 1-year survival probability of 78% ‏(Gustot et al. 2015) ‏.

 
Summary

 

Major progress has been made in defining the natural history and ‏prognosis of ACLF. Regenerative therapies and liver transplantation ‏in selected cases hold promise for the future.

 

Conflict of Interest

 

Philippe Meersseman and Alexander Wilmer declare that they have ‏no conflict of interest.

 

Abbreviations

 

ACLF acute-on-chronic liver failure

CANONIC CLIF Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure in Cirrhosis

CLIF chronic liver failure

CLIF-C Chronic Liver Failure Consortium

CRP c-reactive protein

DAMP damage-associated molecular patterns

G-CSF Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor

ICU intensive care unit

MELD model for end-stage liver disease

OF organ failure

PAMP pathogen-associated molecular patterns

SOFA sequential organ failure assessment

References:

Arroyo V, Moreau R, Jalan R et al. (2015) Acute-on-chronic liver failure: a new syndrome that will re-classify cirrhosis. J Hepatol, 62(1 Suppl): S131-43.

PubMed

 

Arroyo V, Moreau R, Kamath PS et al. (2016) Acute-on-chronic liver failure in cirrhosis. Nat Rev Dis Primers, 2: 16041.  

PubMed

 

Bajaj JS, Hylemon PB, Ridlon JM et al. (2012) Colonic mucosal microbiome differs from stool microbiome in cirrhosis and hepatic encephalopathy and is linked to cognition and inflammation. Am J Physiol Gastrontest Liver Physiol, 303 (6): G675-85.

PubMed

 

Bajaj JS, O'Leary JG, Reddy KR et al. (2014a) Survival in infection-related acute-on-chronic liver failure is defined by extrahepatic organ failures. Hepatology, 60(1): 250-6.

PubMed

 

Bajaj JS, Heuman DM, Hylemon PB et al. (2014b) Altered profile of human gut microbiome is associated with cirrhosis and its complications. J Hepatol, 60(5): 940-7.

PubMed

 

Banares R, Nevens F, Larsen FS et al. (2013) Extracorporeal albumin dialysis with the molecular adsorbent recirculating system in acute-on-chronic liver failure: the RELEF trial. Hepatology, 57(3): 1153-62.

PubMed

 

Bernal W, Jalan R, Quaglia A et al. (2015) Acute-on-chronic liver failure. Lancet, 386(10003): 1576-87.

PubMed

 

Bernardi M, Moreau R, Angeli P et al. (2015) Mechanisms of decompensation and organ failure in cirrhosis: from peripheral arterial vasodilation to systemic inflammation hypothesis. J Hepatol, 63(5): 1272-84.

PubMed

 

Chan AC, Fan ST, Lo CM et al. (2009) Liver transplantation for acute-on-chronic liver failure. Hepatol Int, 3(4): 571-81.

PubMed

 

Chavez-Tapia NC, Mendiola-Pastrana I, Ornelas-Arroyo VJ et al. (2015) Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor for acute-on-chronic liver failure: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Hepatol, 14(5): 631-41.

PubMed

 

Chen Y, Guo J, Qian G et al. (2015) Gut dysbiosis in acute-on-chronic liver failure and its predictive value for mortality. J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 30(9): 1429-37.

PubMed

 

Chen JJ, Huang JR, Yang Q et al. (2016) Plasma-exchange-centred artificial liver support system in hepatitis B virus-related acute-on-chronic liver failure: a nationwide prospective multicentre study in China. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int, 15(3): 275-81.

PubMed

 

Cirera I, Bauer TM. Navasa M et al. (2001) Bacterial translocation of enteric organisms in patients with cirrhosis. J Hepatol, 34(1): 32-7.

PubMed

 

Duan XZ, Liu FF, Tong JJ et al. (2013) Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor therapy improves survival in patients with hepatitis B virus-associated acute-on-chronic-liver failure. World J Gastroenterol, 19(7): 1104-10.

PubMed

 

Finkenstedt A, Nachbaur K, Zoller H et al. (2013) Acute-on-chronic liver failure: excellent outcomes after liver transplantation but high mortality on the waiting list. Liver Transpl, 19(8): 879-86.

PubMed

 

Galbois A, Aegerter P, Martel-Samb P et al. (2014) Improved prognosis of septic shock in patients with cirrhosis: a multicenter study. Crit Care Med, 42(7): 1666-75.

PubMed

 

Garg V, Garg H, Khan A et al. (2012) Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor mobilizes CD34+ cells and improves survival of patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure. Gastroenterology, 142: 505-12.

PubMed

  

Gustot T, Fernandez J, Garcia E et al. (2015) Clinical Course of acute-on-chronic liver failure syndrome and effects on prognosis. Hepatology, 62(1): 243-52.

PubMed

 

Iwasaki A, Medzhitov R (2015) Control of adaptive immunity by the innate immune system. Nat Immunol, 16(4): 343-53.

PubMed

 

Jalan R, Williams R (2002) Acute-on-chronic liver failure: pathophysiological basis of therapeutic options. Blood Purif, 20(3): 252-61.

PubMed

 

Jalan R, Saliba F, Pavesi M et al. (2014) Development and validation of a prognostic score to predict mortality in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure. J Hepatol, 61: 1038-47.

PubMed

 

Kedarisetty CK, Anand L, Bhardwaj A et al. (2015) Combination of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and erythropoietin improves outcomes of patients with decompensated cirrhosis. Gastroenterology, 148(7): 1362-70.

PubMed

 

King A, Barton D, Beard HA et al. (2015) Repeated AutoLogous infusions of stem cells in cirrhosis (REALISTIC): a multicentre, phase II, open-label, randomised controlled trial of repeated autologous infusions of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (GCSF) mobilised CD133+ bone marrow stem cells in patients with cirrhosis. A study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open, 5(3): e007700.

PubMed

 

Kribben A, Gerken G, Haag S et al. (2012) Effects of fractionated plasma separation and adsorption on survival in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure. Gastroenterology, 142(4): 782-789.e3.

PubMed

 

Li H, Chen LY, Zhang NN et al. (2016) Characteristics, diagnosis and prognosis of acute-on-chronic liver failure in cirrhosis associated to Hepatitis B.  Sci Rep, 6: 25487.

PubMed

 

McPhail MJ, Shawcross DL, Abeles RD et al. (2015) Increased survival for patients with cirrhosis and organ failure in liver intensive care and validation of the chronic liver failure-sequential organ failure scoring system. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 13(7): 1353-1360.e8.

PubMed

 

Medzhitov R, Schneider DS, Soares MP (2012) Disease tolerance as a defence strategy. Science, 335(6071): 936-41.

PubMed

 

Moreau R, Jalan R, Gines P et al. (2013) Acute-on-chronic liver failure s a distinct

syndrome that develops in patients with acute decompensation of cirrhosis. Gastroenterology, 144(7): 1426-37.

PubMed

 

Pamecha V, Kumar S, Bharathy KG (2015) Liver transplantation in acute on chronic liver failure: challenges and an algorithm for patient selection and management. Hepatol Int, 9(4): 534-42.

PubMed

 

Rai R, Saraswat VA, Dhiman RK (2014) Gut microbiota: its role in hepatic encephalopathy. J Clin Exp Hepatol, 5(Suppl 1): S29-36.

PubMed

 

Ramachandran P, Iredale JP, Fallowfield JA (2015) Resolution of liver fibrosis: basic mechanisms and clinical relevance. Semin Liver Dis, 35(02): 119-31.

PubMed

 

Reddy MS, Rajalingam R, Rela M (2015) Liver transplantation in acute-on-chronic liver failure: lessons learnt from acute liver failure setting. Hepatol Int, 9(4): 508-13.

PubMed

 

Sargenti K, Prytz H, Nilsson E et al. (2015) Predictors of mortality among patients with compensated and decompensated liver cirrhosis: the role of bacterial infections and infection-related acute-on-chronic liver failure. Scand J Gastroenterol, 50(7): 875-83. 

PubMed

 

Sarin SK, Kedarisetty CK, Abbas Z et al. (2014) Acute-on-chronic liver failure: consensus recommendations of the Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL) 2014. Hepatol Int, 8(4): 453-71.

PubMed

 

Sarin SK, Choudhury A (2016) Acute-on-chronic liver failure: terminology, mechanisms and management.  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol, 13(3): 131-49.

PubMed

 

Shi Y, Shu Z, Sun W et al. (2016) Risk stratification of decompensated cirrhosis patients by the CLIF Consortium scores: a classification and regression tree analysis. Hepatol Res, doi: 10.1111/hepr.12751 [Epub ahead of print] 

PubMed ↗

 

Shiota G, Itaba N (2016) Progress in stem cell-based therapy for liver disease. Hepatol Res, doi: 10.1111/hepr.12747 [Epub ahead of print]

PubMed

 

Silva PE, Fayad L, Lazzarotto C et al. (2015) Single-centre validation of the EASL-CLIF consortium definition of acute-on-chronic liver failure and CLIF-SOFA for prediction of mortality in cirrhosis. Liver Int, 35(5): 1516-23.

PubMed

 

Verbeke L, Nevens F, Laleman W (2011) Bench-to-beside review: acute-on-chronic liver failure - linking the gut, liver and systemic circulation. Crit Care, 15(5): 233.

PubMed

 

Zekri AR, Salama H, Medhat E et al. (2015) The impact of repeated autologous infusion of hematopoietic stem cells in patients with liver insufficiency. Stem Cell Res, 6: 118. 

PubMed




Related Articles

The idea of liver assist is extremely attractive for patients with liver failure, as the liver possesses huge capacity to regenerate.... Read more

The implementation of patient blood management programmes led to reduced blood product usage. However, haemorrhage secondary... Read more

Liver, acute-on-chronic liver failure Evolving Concepts in Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure

No comment


Please login to leave a comment...

Highlighted Products