Surge in CT for Minor Injuries in California
Some 39 percent of CTs in the study were ordered at level I and II trauma centres, compared with three percent at low-level centres. "This may reflect an underlying work culture largely centred around the management of severely injured patients, guided by standard trauma CT protocols, and also the fact that level I and II trauma centres see sicker patients," according to the study published in the Journal of Surgical Research.
Researchers at UCSF and Stanford studied more than 8 million adult patient visits at 348 state hospitals, using data from the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development. These patients had been discharged after being seen in emergency departments for injuries such as minor falls or low-impact vehicle accidents.
The researchers found that 3.51 percent of patients underwent at least one CT scan in 2005, versus 7.17 percent in 2013. The increase was due to different factors, including defensive medicine practices, the superior diagnostic accuracy of CT scans compared with x-rays, and the demand to expedite discharge of patients, the researchers explain.
See Also: Ruling out CT for Minor Head Trauma
While CT scans enable clinicians to swiftly pinpoint life-threatening conditions, exposure to its ionising radiation is associated with an increased risk of cancer. According to a 2009 report by the FDA, a single CT scan may be associated with a fatal cancer in one in 2,000 patients.
In the current study, a large proportion of the patients receiving CT scans were between the ages of 18 and 24, "those at greatest risk for radiation," note the researchers, as well as those over 45.
"The message for both patients and physicians is that there are long-term risks associated with radiation exposure and there may be situations where imaging is not definitively warranted or beneficial," says senior author Renee Hsia, MD, professor of emergency medicine and health policy at UCSF.
"We can't conclusively say which cases should not involve imaging, since every patient and every circumstance is different, but given that it is getting easier and easier to get CT scans, we need to be cautious in weighing their risks and benefits," adds Dr. Hsia.
Source: University of California - San Francisco
Image credit: Flickr.com
Published on : Tue, 19 Jan 2016
The Next Evolution in Ultrasound, designed for high expectations ARIETTA 850 ultrasound platform responds to high expectations to answer the ever increasing demands of medical professionals. ARIETTA 850’s fundamental performance has been refined...
Newly redesigned Precision Flow Packettes™ allow pinpoint application to a transducer head or skin surface while eliminating the potential for gel cross-contamination. Available for Aquasonic® 100 and hypoallergenic Aquasonic CLEAR®. FEATURES...
If you’re striving for a faster, more accurate diagnosis at an affordable cost… Our Surpia CT scanner will help you achieve it. Supria is ideal for broad range of CT examinations. It delivers excellent image quality. It’s easy to use. It’s designed...
UltraDrape is an innovative dressing designed for use during Ultrasound-Guided Peripheral Intravenous (UGPIV) that provides dual-action barrier and securement in one.
Open high-field efficiency with patient-centric architecture OASIS™ is a new generation of MR systems, providing a high degree of diagnostic confidence and extraordinary patient comfort. With this unique scanner, Hitachi combines best high-field performance...