Academy of Medical Sciences Calls for More Research Time

Academy of Medical Sciences Calls for More Research Time
share Share

A new report suggests the UK’s National Health Service (NHS) should run a pilot project allowing more protected research time for NHS staff.


Estimate of the economic costs and literature review of the benefits of dedicated research time for Hospital Consultants in the NHS
was commissioned by the Academy of Medical Sciences within its wider project, ‘Enhancing the NHS-academia interface.’

 

You may also like: Most Discussed Medical and Health Sciences Publications 2019

 

The authors identified that it is impossible for most Consultants (except Consultant Clinical Academics) to find time for carrying out research on top of their direct clinical care duties. Therefore, giving one in five of Consultants one day a week for research means backfilling of an equivalent amount of time for direct clinical care.


In a Teaching Hospital Trust (415 Consultants on average) the backfilling would cost €3.5 million (£3.01 million), and
in a District General Hospital Trust (182 Consultants on average) €1.53 million (£1.32 million) per year. Thus, the proposed pilot would cost €25.23 million (£21.7 million): €17.56 million (£15.1 million) for five Teaching Hospital Trusts and €7.67 million (£6.6 million) for five District General Hospital Trusts. If the backfilling is done not by Consultants on rotation, but by locum Consultants, the overall cost would rise to €29.01 million (£25 million) per year.


It is noted that this
cost could be offset by benefits. There were no evidence in the study that this can be quantified in any meaningful way. The literature review, however, showed that providing staff with dedicated research time was related to successful research programmes as well as increasing level of job satisfaction and employee retention among others.


For the NHS, the potential benefits of allowing the staff time for research are important in the context of high vacancy rates among
medical staff and the cost of using agency staff.


In conclusion, the authors of the report recommend that a pilot study examine the actual cost of providing dedicated
research time to clinicians. They also underscore that a number of the benefit metrics should be assessed, including job satisfaction; improvement in clinical outcomes; the success of research programmes, etc.


In his comment to Laboratory News Professor Sir Robert Lechler, President of the Academy of Medical Sciences, stressed the importance of research for patients, the NHS, Universities and economy in general. “Research is the tonic the NHS needs right now,” he said. "There is increasing evidence that shows that patients treated in research active hospitals get better quality of care, even if they are not taking part in a research project.”


Source: Academy of Medical Sciences

Image credit: iStock

«« 2020 World Patient Safety, Science & Technology Summit


Healthcare Trends to Watch in 2020 »»

Published on : Mon, 13 Jan 2020



Related Articles
Coronavirus Outbreak: Facilitating Collaboration During Emergencies

By 28 January, more than 100 people have died in China in the latest novel coronavirus, known as 2019-nCoV, outbreak,... Read more

Single Patient Safety Database for NHS and Private Care

Patient safety data across the UK public (National Health System, NHS) and private healthcare sectors to be gathered in... Read more

Teaming and Funding Opportunities for COVID-19 Researchers

Through two new online tools, COVID-19 researchers around the world now have the opportunity to find and team up with one... Read more

Research, NHS, clinical care, Academy of Medical Sciences Academy of Medical Sciences Calls for More Research Time

No comment


Please login to leave a comment...