Artificial intelligence steadily moves from hospital corridors to living rooms where chronic wounds are managed day to day. In home settings, care unfolds through ongoing relationships, sensory appraisal and constant adjustment to circumstances that rarely look like a clinic. Insights from registered nurses working in Swedish municipalities highlight where digital tools could help and where they may fall short. Image analysis, structured prompts and smoother information flow were seen as useful, yet only if they strengthen the judgement that develops at the bedside and in the home. The message is pragmatic: technology should make good care easier to deliver, not more distant or more rigid.
Care Built on Relationships, Senses and Adaptation
Nurses described home wound care as relational work. Regular visits build trust, allow goals to be shaped together and make it easier to address issues that influence healing, from daily routines to practical barriers. Progress is often won in conversations that connect treatment with the realities of life at home. Systems that compress encounters into checkboxes risk crowding out the attention that nurtures adherence and continuity.
Must Read: Strengthening Nurse Trust in Healthcare AI
Assessment was portrayed as multisensory. Photographs can be helpful, but they do not replace the fine-grained observations gathered through sight, touch and smell. Subtle colour shifts, tissue texture and odour contribute to understanding how a wound is evolving. These are judgements formed over time, drawing on experience and context as much as on surface appearance. Tools that rely primarily on images may support classification yet still miss cues that steer day-to-day decisions.
Adaptation threads through every visit. Lighting may be limited, surfaces improvised and supplies constrained. Plans change as conditions change, even for patients with similar clinical profiles. Nurses weigh what is desirable against what is possible, aligning care with preferences and the home environment. Rigid automation struggles in such settings. The value of any digital aid lies in how well it accommodates variation without slowing action or narrowing options.
Tension Between Standardisation and Clinical Sense-Making
The nurses’ accounts sit within a wider tension. Many digital systems are introduced to make documentation uniform or to guide practice through preset pathways. That may suit administrative objectives, but it can collide with the fluid work of caring for complex wounds in the home. When workflows are shaped chiefly by the needs of record keeping, the space for clinical sense-making can shrink. Forms and drop-downs tidy the record but do not always mirror the reasoning that clinicians use at the point of care.
In the settings described, advanced machine learning was not embedded in daily routines. Projects were at early stages and digital activity centred on basic recording. Even so, the nurses could see where AI might offer support. They also noted how easily a tool can displace what matters if introduced without attention to practice. If technology channels attention to what is easy to capture rather than what is essential to decide, care risks becoming less responsive. The challenge is not opposition to innovation but the fit between system design and clinical work.
Designing AI to Extend, Not Constrain, Nursing Practice
Practical opportunities were identified. Image analysis could help track change and prompt a closer look. Decision support might structure assessments and highlight concerns. Communication features could improve coordination across teams. Yet usefulness depends on design choices. Tools should be light to use during a visit, quick to adapt to patient goals and tolerant of the unpredictability of home environments. They should return time to the encounter, not take it away.
The nurses pointed to involvement as a lever for better outcomes. When those who deliver care help shape digital tools, adoption improves and disruption falls. Early participation can align interfaces with the cadence of a home visit, ensure that nuanced observations have a place in the record and keep continuity at the centre of the workflow. It also helps reconcile what managers need to see with what clinicians need to decide. In that alignment, AI becomes a quiet aide rather than a loud overseer.
Home wound care thrives on relationships, multisensory expertise and flexible planning. AI can assist with analysis, structure and communication, provided it is built around these foundations. For healthcare professionals, the priority is clear: choose and design tools that extend clinical judgement, protect time with patients and absorb the variability of home settings. That approach keeps technology in service of care and preserves the human touch that helps wounds heal.
Source: Digital Health Insights
Image Credit: iStock
