Silent Transmission as Pandemic’s Driving Force

Silent Transmission as Pandemic’s Driving Force
share Share

Empirical studies indicate that COVID-19 cases may be most infectious during the presymptomatic phase of the disease, which baffles experts as this is rather 'unusual' in the progression of a respiratory infection. This kind of silent transmission has been the subject of two recent studies.

 

You might also like: COVID-19 Transmission Among Close Contacts

 

A study by a U.S.-Canadian research team (Moghadas et al. 2020) aimed to determine the contribution of presymptomatic and asymptomatic transmission regarding infectiousness prior to the onset of COVID-19 symptoms.

 

Based on empirical data, it is estimated that asymptomatic infections account for 17.9 to 30.8% of all infections. Based on these estimated values, the researchers set about to quantify the proportion of the attack rate associated with transmission during presymptomatic, asymptomatic and symptomatic phases.

 

This quantification was made using a series of scenario analyses to determine the level of isolation necessary for symptomatic or silently infected individuals, so as to keep the attack rate below 1%.

 

The research team found that the majority of transmission is due to silent transmission – a combination of the presymptomatic stage and asymptomatic infections. When 17.9% of infections are asymptomatic, the researchers noted that the presymptomatic phase and asymptomatic infections account for 48% and 3.4% of transmission, respectively.

 

As such, even if all symptomatic COVID-19 cases are isolated, a surge in outbreak may not be prevented. For example, in a scenario where silent spreaders and symptomatic cases are put in isolation, the researchers say over one-third of silent infections must be isolated to suppress a future outbreak below 1% of the population.

 

In this study, silent transmission has been found to be the primary driver of COVID-19 outbreaks, highlighting the need for mitigation strategies, such as contact tracing, that detect and isolate infectious individuals prior to the onset of symptoms.

 

Notably, delays in contact tracing increase the risk of further infection spread, given that asymptomatic individuals are generally unaware of their infection risk to others, and therefore are less likely to limit their social interactions.

 

In conclusion, the study authors say symptom-based isolation must be supplemented by rapid contact tracing and testing that identifies asymptomatic and presymptomatic cases, in order to safely lift current quarantine/lockdown restrictions and minimise the risk of resurgence.

 

The other study (Stubblefield et al. n.d.) focussed on asymptomatic healthcare personnel as a potentially important source of SARS-CoV-2 transmission. A cohort of healthcare staff at Vanderbilt University Medical Center (USA) underwent serological testing for the coronavirus developed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

 

The eligibility criteria included regularly being in direct patient contact with COVID-19 patients in various units of the centre, within one month of the first local COVID-19 hospitalisation. The 249 healthcare workers enrolled in the study included nurses (42.2%), providers (34.5%) as well as radiology technicians other staff.

 

In total, 19 (7.6%) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, but only 11 of them (57.9%) had reported prior symptoms of a viral illness, namely cough, sore throat and myalgias, while 7 (36.8%) believed they previously had COVID-19.

 

Notably, of the 19 healthcare staff only 7 had earlier tested for SARS-CoV-2 and only 3 of those had positive results. “This suggests that testing only symptomatic personnel misses a substantial number of SARS-CoV-2 cases among practicing healthcare personnel,” the authors write. They opine that widespread surveillance testing of asymptomatic and minimally symptomatic healthcare personnel may prove a useful strategy for containing the spread of COVID-19.

 

Image credit: Tomas Ragina via iStock

 

«« Lockdowns in LMICs: Finding the Balance


Refusal to Be Tested: What to Do? »»

References:

Moghadas SM et al. (2020) The implications of silent transmission for the control of COVID-19 outbreaks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. Published online 6 July. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2008373117

 

Stubblefield WB et al. (n.d.) Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 Among Frontline Healthcare Personnel During the First Month of Caring for COVID-19 Patients — Nashville, Tennessee, Clinical Infectious Diseases, ciaa936, https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa936


Published on : Tue, 14 Jul 2020



Related Articles
Lockdowns in LMICs: Finding the Balance

The economic fallout from pandemic-related lockdowns has been enormous, especially in low and middle-income countries... Read more

Pandemic Legal Database

COVID-19 spurred a vast increase in urgent legislative action directed at controlling the disease. However, poor design, implementation... Read more

Factors Impacting COVID-19 Data Reporting

Up-to-date information on COVID-19 incidence and mortality provides guidance on public health response to the pandemic.... Read more

COVID-19, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, disease transmission, silent transmission Silent Transmission as Pandemic’s Driving Force

No comment


Please login to leave a comment...