Machine learning has transformed medical image analysis, offering powerful tools to address diverse clinical challenges. However, beyond algorithms and technical advancements, the values guiding machine learning research significantly impact its development and application. Understanding these values—ranging from accuracy and fairness to explainability and automation—sheds light on how machine learning models are designed and deployed in healthcare. A key aspect of this discussion revolves around the spectrum between end-to-end and separable learning approaches, which reflects fundamental value-based decisions in machine learning research.
The Influence of Research Values on Technical Decisions
Scientific research, though often perceived as purely objective, is deeply influenced by non-empirical values. In machine learning for medical image analysis, values such as high accuracy, fairness and security shape technical decisions. Some values are quantifiable, such as accuracy metrics, while others, like interpretability, remain subjective. These values do not only influence which technical approaches are pursued but also affect data collection, training processes and evaluation criteria.
A key framework in this discourse is the end-to-end vs. separate learning spectrum. End-to-end learning minimises human-defined intermediate steps, relying entirely on data-driven optimisation, while separable learning incorporates explicit intermediate representations that structure the model’s decision-making process. The choice between these approaches is driven by values such as explainability, efficiency and reproducibility, demonstrating the impact of value-based considerations on machine learning architectures.
Intermediate Representations and Their Role in Learning Approaches
Intermediate representations (IRs) serve as conceptual steps between raw data and final model outputs. In traditional medical image analysis, explicit intermediate representations, such as segmentations or feature measurements, provide interpretability and human oversight. Separable learning emphasises these representations, enabling greater transparency and modularity, whereas end-to-end learning seeks to bypass them for greater optimisation flexibility.
This spectrum can be illustrated through real-world applications. In subcortical brain anatomy segmentation for deep brain stimulation, models range from fully end-to-end approaches that segment entire images in a single step to separable models that estimate key anatomical landmarks before refining segmentation. Similarly, in cardiac performance measurement, some models directly predict clinical metrics like ejection fraction, while others explicitly segment cardiac structures first. In breast cancer screening, end-to-end models classify entire images, whereas separable approaches first detect and assess individual lesions. These examples highlight how technical decisions regarding intermediate representations are shaped by underlying research values.
Connecting Technical Decisions to Broader Research and Clinical Goals
Beyond technical implementation, research values influence the broader lifecycle of machine learning models. Choices made during problem definition, data collection, training and evaluation shape how a model integrates into clinical practice. Annotation efficiency, for instance, is a crucial consideration—end-to-end models require minimal annotation effort but may lack interpretability, whereas separable models demand more detailed annotations while providing greater transparency.
Similarly, knowledge discovery depends on how models structure information. Separable learning aligns with logocentric accessibility, making findings more interpretable and communicable. End-to-end models offer knowledge flexibility, potentially uncovering novel patterns but at the cost of interpretability. These trade-offs extend to real-world applications, affecting regulatory approval, clinical adoption and ethical considerations surrounding bias, security and fairness.
Must Read: Enhancing Medical Image Segmentation: The RIDGE Checklist Framework
Machine learning in medical image analysis is shaped not only by algorithmic advancements but also by the values that guide research and development. The choice between end-to-end and separable learning reflects deeper considerations regarding transparency, efficiency and generalisability. By examining how research values influence technical decisions, we can better understand the trade-offs in machine learning implementation and work towards models that align with clinical needs and ethical principles. Recognising and addressing these value-based decisions will be critical in ensuring responsible and effective use of machine learning in healthcare.
Source: Medical Image Analysis
Image Credit: iStock
