Artificial intelligence (AI) is revolutionising radiology, offering improved diagnostic precision and operational efficiency. Deep learning models, particularly within medical imaging, are at the forefront of this transformation. However, the increasing adoption of AI in radiology has introduced a complex sustainability paradox. While AI holds the promise of optimising clinical workflows and expanding access to care, it simultaneously poses serious environmental, economic and social challenges. Understanding and mitigating these impacts is essential for a responsible and sustainable future.
Environmental Impact: Innovation with a Carbon Cost
The environmental footprint of AI in radiology is considerable, driven primarily by energy-intensive training and inference processes. Deep learning models require large datasets and high-performance computing hardware such as GPUs and TPUs, both of which demand substantial electricity. This energy consumption not only contributes to high carbon emissions but also generates significant levels of electronic waste. As the complexity and adoption of AI models rise, so do emissions, which are projected to reach levels comparable to those of entire nations.
Must Read: Resilient Radiology: A Sustainable Response to Climate Change
Cloud computing and data storage further exacerbate the situation. Data centres, vital for processing and storing vast amounts of imaging data, consume substantial electricity and water, particularly for cooling systems. Moreover, the rapid obsolescence of AI hardware contributes to global electronic waste, which often contains toxic materials and relies on non-renewable resources.
Green AI strategies offer potential pathways to mitigate environmental harm. Techniques such as pruning, quantisation, transfer learning and federated learning can reduce model size and energy requirements. Environmentally friendly hardware alternatives, renewable energy sources for data centres and efficient cooling methods can also lower carbon and water footprints. Radiology departments can contribute by adopting better data management, recycling outdated hardware and aligning with emerging green computing guidelines.
Economic Viability: Innovation Versus Value
While AI promises long-term benefits in radiology, its economic sustainability remains uncertain. Many AI tools are marketed on the basis of potential efficiency gains and enhanced decision-making, but lack robust evidence demonstrating substantial clinical or operational improvements. In most cases, incremental enhancements in diagnostic performance have yet to significantly reduce workload or improve patient outcomes.
The costs associated with AI adoption are substantial and go beyond licensing fees. Institutions must also invest in hardware upgrades, cloud infrastructure, training and maintenance. Without clear returns on investment, these expenses may strain healthcare budgets and lead to inequities in access, particularly in underfunded systems. Additionally, the rapid commercial growth of AI, driven by investor interests, risks shifting focus from equitable care to profitability.
Sustainable economic models are essential. AI solutions should be assessed for cost-effectiveness using established health economic frameworks, including metrics like quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. Outcome-based licensing models and continuous monitoring can help align costs with demonstrated clinical value. Furthermore, reducing redundant imaging and optimising workflow through AI can generate tangible savings. By focusing on proven applications that deliver clear operational and clinical benefits, healthcare systems can ensure the economic sustainability of AI in radiology.
Social Equity: Ensuring Inclusive AI Adoption
The social dimension of AI sustainability is often overlooked but critically important. Bias in AI algorithms, arising from non-representative training datasets or systemic healthcare disparities, can result in unequal performance across different demographic groups. This undermines trust and reinforces existing inequities in access and care quality. Moreover, the deployment of AI technologies often favours resource-rich settings, widening the gap between well-funded and underserved healthcare systems.
Achieving social sustainability requires proactive strategies. AI tools must be developed with diverse and representative datasets and include bias audits and transparent reporting. Collaborative, community-driven development ensures cultural relevance and helps avoid neocolonial models of technology transfer. Scalable and cost-effective AI solutions, supported by funding mechanisms and partnerships, can broaden access in low-resource environments.
Ensuring transparency and accountability through frameworks like STANDING Together and continuous post-deployment monitoring is essential. Explainable AI can build trust among patients and providers by making algorithmic decisions more interpretable. Ultimately, socially sustainable AI empowers all communities, ensuring that the benefits of innovation are equitably shared and tailored to diverse needs.
AI in radiology holds enormous transformative potential, but its sustainability paradox cannot be ignored. Environmental concerns about energy consumption and electronic waste, economic challenges around cost-effectiveness and social risks of inequity and bias must be addressed collectively. By integrating green computing practices, economic evaluation and socially inclusive strategies, the radiology community can guide AI development in a responsible and equitable direction. Only through such holistic stewardship can the field harness AI’s capabilities while safeguarding environmental health, promoting economic viability and ensuring equitable care for all.
Source: Insights into Imaging
Image Credit: iStock
